I don’t have any Republican friends (well, not any that will cop
to that), but I do have Republican acquaintances. And that’s fine. Nobody’s perfect. We are all entitled to one mega mistake per
lifetime.
Usually when I find out that acquaintances are Republicans, without
fail, I always take a pregnant pause. My
first impression usually is, “He seems so normal.” “She is so rational.” “How is that possible?” Then for I a split second or more like
several minutes, I picture them listening to and believing the rhetoric of
people like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
I picture them being unfair, illogical, hateful, racist, bigoted.
But because these people appear amicable, I wonder if peoples’ personalities
or traits cause them to be Republican or being Republican causes them to have
certain characteristics or attributes. I mean during small talk, these people and I relate to so many
things like family, careers and vacations; they seem so sane. So it really troubles me to perceive them as
having weird political beliefs. I
kid. I kid.
But seriously, if I were a Republican, would I have a different
mindset? Would I see the world totally differently? I always think of it as a ‘which comes first,
the chicken or the egg’ scenario. If I
were a Republican, would I believe that every child should be entitled to a
great public school or believing that every child is entitled to a great public
school makes me a Liberal?
If I were a Republican, would I believe that every frigging nut
job is entitled to own a boatload of automatic weapons or knowing that the
right to bear arms is highly overrated makes me a Liberal?
If I were a Republican, would I believe that the “job creators”
are the only ones who can crank up the economy or because I believe that building
and maintaining infrastructure will create stateside jobs makes me a Liberal?
If I were a Republican, would I believe that health insurance companies should not prosper from consumers’ ill health and death or would I believe that health insurance companies like any other company is in business solely to profit? Would it make a difference if a baby needs a life saving innovative procedure but the parents have reached the lifetime limit?
Would I refrain from assisting the poor and elderly with such
vehemence but have no trouble giving billions of dollars in tax credits to
multi-billion dollar corporations?
Look I’m as liberal as they come. Okay, maybe more. I believe that as much as I would not have an
abortion, I would not inject my personal beliefs and morals on someone who
chooses to have one. Although the idea
of using abortion as birth control seems ridiculous to me, I cannot in good conscience
tell someone else that under the law, they cannot do that. Who am I to say that if a woman or girl is
raped, whether forcibly or not, that she will be in the right mind to have that
child, to raise that child, to have that child be a reminder of what she
endured? Likewise that girl whose baby
was conceived in an incestuous rape or that woman whose life is at risk due to
a pregnancy and wants to bring that baby to term and vows to love that baby,
again, who am I to condemn her? I refuse
to pretend to know someone else’s psyche.
As heterosexual as I am, I have no problem with same sex
marriage. Who am I to tell someone else
that the person he is in love with is wrong in my eyes? That her life is a sin? Plus, why should heterosexuals alone
suffer? Marriage should be an equal
rights suffering opportunity.
After 9/11, I vehemently disagreed with the government for profiling
Muslims and others from the Middle East, especially since not everyone from
Asia or the Middle East is a Muslim. Wire
tapping ordinary citizens and strip searching airline passengers all in the
name of the nation’s security should feel like an infringement to Republicans. Yet, after 9/11, all of that was quite fine.
To demonstrate how outlandish Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) is, check this out.
After the Shoe Bomber’s inept attempt to bring a plane down two months
after 9/11, no one was permitted to board a plane without removing his shoes. After several failed liquid explosives
attempt, passengers were again banned from travelling with liquids on their
person. So even if you were seen
drinking a can of Coke, you would have to finish it or dispose of it before going
on the plane. And you mothers don’t even
think you can bring your babies’ bottles on board. You better fill their small bellies before
you get on that plane. Force it down
their throats if you have to or discard it. Those are
your choices. I always wondered why no
one at the executive level ever recommended that the agents used a little bit
of common sense and enforced the rules on a case by case basis.
But another thing I always wondered about is this: After the Underwear Bomber failed to detonate
his bomb, why weren’t we banned from wearing or removing our underwear before boarding
flights?
My Republican acquaintances might not have seen me in a different light,
had I reveal that I’m a Liberal, but they probably would be taken aback knowing
that I actually possess some not so liberal ideas. Like I truly believe that although it is the government’s
job to ensure that its citizens are taken care of in terms of education and
wellbeing, everyone should take personal responsibility for himself. If you are of a certain age, seek employment. If you keep having babies for different fathers
who are unwilling to support you, stop.
If you have children in school, read to them and don’t depend on
teachers to do it all.
However, as liberal as I lean in terms of my political and social
views, I have always been an independent minded individual, and I tolerate everyone's point of view, even Republicans, no matter how wrong they are - perspectively speaking.